Discreet government and military liaisons.
In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content: More significantly, the interrogation measures we adopt define who we are as a society. In the book and in various interviews during the promotional tour for the volume, Rodriquez vigorously defends counterterrorism measures used by the CIA in the war on terror, including rendition and enhanced interrogation techniques.
He argues that the enhanced techniques used on Abu Zubaydah and Khalid Sheikh Mohammed resulted in intelligence that was key in the prevention of specific terrorist plots. Medunjanin was brought to trial after authorities discovered the plot and after his accomplices, Najibullah Zazi and Zarein Ahmedzay, agreed to testify against Medunjanin as part of a plea agreement.
At trial, Zazi and Ahmedzay testified that they had traveled with Medunjanin to Pakistan in to train with al Qaeda. These two stories—one lauding the success of enhanced interrogation techniques, the other noting a terrorist attack narrowly averted—provide a useful frame for discussing counterterrorism and the rule of law, because they highlight the ongoing threat of terrorism and the need for intelligence about potential threats in order to prevent them.
Those who work in the field of counterterrorism know all too well that a successful terrorist attack is almost inevitable and that the effort to prevent terrorist attacks will require an ongoing calibration of the appropriate moral and legal measures to combat that threat.
We can begin by noting that when suspected terrorists are in custody, at least two values may be deeply at odds. What policy appropriately balances these potentially conflicting values? In answering this question, it is useful to be concrete. What techniques should be used to interrogate suspected terrorists?
If you would like to authenticate using a different subscribed institution that supports Shibboleth authentication or have your own login and password to Project MUSE, click 'Authenticate'. You are not currently authenticated. View freely available titles:CHICAGO PUBLIC LAW AND LEGAL THEORY WORKING PAPER NO.
84 SHOULD COERCIVE INTERROGATION BE LEGAL? Eric A. Posner and Adrian Vermeule THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO March This paper can be downloaded without charge at the Public Law and Legal Theory Working Paper.
But in fact the CIA manual devotes fully a fifth of its instructions to coercive interrogation techniques, or torture, including isolation, “deprivation of sensory stimuli,” induction of. Interrogation Techniques Essay - Interrogation is a conversation, between a law enforcement officer and a person who is suspected of committing a crime or assisting others to commit a .
|April 30, 2007||While I like her fiction, I find her nonfiction bombastic and often hilariously uninformed about everything from philosophy to science.|
|The Use of Coercion in Interrogations | Assignment Essays||These organizations strictly prohibit their members from participating in interrogations in which coercion is used. These organizations claim that coercion is unethical.|
|Trackback Pings||Many professionals devised the move like those from the health care, lawyers justifying it, with the higher levels of government authorizing it.|
The people who support coercive interrogation techniques, and I am one of them, do so sadly. Unfortunately, given the nature of the war we’re in, certain moral compromises are a necessity. Using coercive interrogation techniques is one of them. Coercive interrogation manuals, such as the edition of the U.S.
Army’s School of the Americas manual, call for the services of physicians and psychiatrists.  To obtain the physicians’ perspective, the Indian Medical Association surveyed a random sample of 4, members.
. Include examples of coercive techniques and the purported effectiveness. You will need to address the possibility of false confessions as a result of coercive techniques. Submission Details.